Testimony to the Maryland Legislature
|
2001 Gun Bills |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
amended to ban armor for felons w/o permit |
2002 Gun Bills |
|
Officers |
|||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Residence - Defense |
||||
|
|
|
2003 Gun Bills |
||
|
Attorney General of Calif. Report (See also our Ballistic Fingerprinting Brief and John Lott's Bullets and Bunkum article) |
See also the Maryland State Police Testimony:
|
2004 Gun Bills |
||
|
big lie about a Maryland Cop being killed and cops at risk. Grabber propaganda was printed by the Post and the Sun during the year so, it was necessary to conduct a public relations campaign to counter media deceptions. The Washington Post called for passing the Maryland assault weapons ban while admitting the reasons for the ban contained lies. Their article, “A Roll Call on Weapons” and our response correcting the record is given here. The Sun repeated false claims about assault weapon killings cops in "Md. lawmakers hear gun-ban testimony." Our correction of the record was ignored. prepare for CeaseFire MD's claim of risks to police based on the Violence Policy Center (VPC) report "Officer Down, Assault Weapons and the War on Law Enforcement," 2003. Although not identified by the VPC, our research discovered the name of each of the 41 officers the VPC claimed was killed by an "assault weapon" and we gathered the circumstances of their deaths. This research was the basis of testimony we presented. The table gives a summary of the findings for the 41 officers. More information about this research may be found on our briefs page. Not only was CeaseFire MD revealed as lying about risks to police officers, but one of their board members testifying to the Senate was revealed as claiming academic degrees which came from a diploma mill. about the gun used to kill their brother FBI agent Mike Miller later in 2004 telegraphing their intent to continue the battle in 2005. several corrections were submitted to the Post including one to their Ombudsman. The Post published no correction of the record. |
See the Democrats' justification in the graphic below: ![]() |
2005 Gun Bills |
|
|
|
2006 Gun Bills |
|
|
2007 Gun Bills
|
|
After the large effort in 2004 to pass a ban on semi-automatic rifles
and shotguns with 20 senate sponsors and 71 house sponsors, interest
by Maryland Democrats has diminished to the point that no ban bill was offered in the
House in 2007 and no bill at all by the House or the Senate in 2008. The
Maryland Senate interest in a ban was still high in 2007 with a ban bill SB 43
sponsored by the 21 senators: Lenett, Britt, Conway, Currie, Exum, Forehand,
Frosh, Garagiola, Gladden, Jones, Kelley, Kramer, Madaleno, McFadden, Muse, Pinsky,
Pugh, Raskin, Robey, Rosapepe, and Zirkin. The return of an effort to ban
semi-automatic rifles can be expected in the near future after elections in
2008 (see model bill). This 2007 ban effort included support from a report by CeaseFire MD titled "EVERY 48 HOURS An Analysis Of Assault Rifles An Analysis Of Assault Rifles Traced To Crime In Maryland," September 2006, authored by CeaseFire Maryland Inc. Board Member Susan Peschin. Comments on this rather poor CeaseFire document were posted to Maryland Alert in a series of messages ending in January 2007 in time for the 2007 legislative session. The content of these messages has been edited and is offered here for wider distribution as eight linked documents. The posting (copied from another web site) "Abatement of Gun Violence" by Det. Bailey, Montgomery County [Maryland] Police Department, Firearms Investigations Unit, has interesting additions to the facts available about criminal use of "assault weapons". The conclusions of Det. Bailey are:
|
||||||
Updated by
Phil Lee on 7/29/10. Contact maryland_alert# at Yahoo dot com (remove the #; sorry for being obscure, but web mail address
scavenge programs make this practice necessary).